Regalado

Regalado v. Fresno County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 13, 20241:23-cv-00672California943 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 C.R.A. by and through his legal guardian Case No. 1:23-cv-00672-KES-BAM

NATASHJA ALVAREZ, MELCHOR

DAVID ALVAREZ, as successors in ORDER STAYING PROCEEDINGS interest to decedent RAYMOND AGAINST DEFENDANT WELLPATH, LLC REGALADO, PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) Plaintiffs, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE

SHOULD NOT BE STAYED

v. FRESNO COUNTY, et al., Defendants. 18 This action commenced on May 2, 2023. (Doc. 1.) The operative first amended complaint, which was filed by Plaintiffs C.R.A. (by and through his legal guardian Natyshja Alvarez) and Melchor David Alvarez, asserts claims against Defendants: (1) Wellpath LLC; (2) County of Fresno; (3) Fresno County Sheriff’s Department; and (4) Does 1-25. (Doc. 63.) Trial has not been set. On November 15, 2024, Defendant Wellpath, LLC (“Wellpath”) filed a suggestion of bankruptcy and notice of stay indicating that on November 11, 2024, Wellpath filed for bankruptcy in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.