Daniel Seegmiller v. 3M Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 11, 20242:24-cv-06755California702 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES -- GENERAL

Case No. CV 24-6755-JFW(SSCx) Date: December 11, 2024 Title: Daniel Seegmiller, et al. -v- 3M Company, et al.

PRESENT:

HONORABLE JOHN F. WALTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Shannon Reilly None Present Courtroom Deputy Court Reporter

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS:

None None

PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL OF

ACTION

On July 9, 2024, Plaintiffs Daniel Seegmiller and Ann Seegmiller (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed a Complaint against approximately forty defendants in Los Angeles Superior Court (“LASC”), alleging claims for: (1) negligence; (2) products liability; (3) loss of consortium; and (4) premises owner/contractor liability. In their Complaint, Plaintiffs alleged that Daniel Seegmiller was exposed to asbestos-containing products manufactured by the defendants while serving in the United States Navy as a plumber from 1968 to 1972. Plaintiffs also alleged that Daniel Seegmiller had been diagnosed with an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.