Molina

Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Molina

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 12, 20241:23-cv-01553California2,702 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE Case No. 1:23-cv-01553-CDB

COMPANY,

ORDER DENYING CROSS-DEFENDANT’S Plaintiff, RENEWED MOTIONS FOR APPOINTMENT

OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM AND COUNSEL

v. (Doc. 50, 55) CONCEPCION FLORES MOLINA,

ORDER DENYING REQUESTS FOR EX

16 Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff, PARTE COMPETENCY HEARING

17 v. (Docs. 54, 55)

LUPE C. FLORES, ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE

19 Defendant/Cross-Defendant.

21 Pending before the Court are three filings by Cross-Defendant Lupe Flores: the first appears to be a motion to appoint counsel and guardian ad litem and notice of diagnosis (Doc. 50), the second a response to the Court’s order to show cause and notice of diagnosis (Doc. 54), and the third an additional motion to appoint counsel and guardian ad litem and notice of diagnosis (Doc. 55). Having considered the papers, the Court construes the filings to be, more properly, renewed motions for appointment of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.