J.J

J.J v. Ashlynn Marketing Group, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20243:24-cv-00311California1,403 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 J.J. and C.D., individually and on behalf Case No.: 24-cv-00311-GPC-MSB of all others similarly situated,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

Plaintiff, MOTION TO PROCEED UNDER v. PSEUDONYM

ASHLYNN MARKETING GROUP,

[ECF No. 41]

INC.,

16 Defendant.

Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion to proceed under pseudonym. ECF No. 41. Defendant filed a notice of non-opposition in response to the motion. ECF No. 43. The Court finds the matter suitable for decision on the papers. For the reasons below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ motion to proceed under pseudonym. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs filed the instant action on February 16, 2024, ECF No. 1, and filed an amended complaint on April 2, 2024, ECF No. 7 (“FAC”). Plaintiffs allege that Defendant has engaged in “false, misleading, deceptive, and negligent sales practices regarding its kratom powder, capsule, and liquid…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.