Jaewook Ha v. Daniel Cho

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 13, 20242:24-cv-07542California268 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. CV 24-07542-SK Date: December 13, 2024 Title Jaewook Ha v. Daniel Cho et al

Present: The Honorable: Steve Kim, United States Magistrate Judge

Connie Chung n/a

Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorneys Present for Defendant(s):

None present None present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL

FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

For the reason checked below, Plaintiff(s) is ORDERED to show cause on or before December 27, 2024 why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion). x Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a Defendant within 90 days after the complaint is filed. Plaintiff has failed to file a proof of service within 90 days of the filing of the Complaint on Defendants Daniel Cho and C and H Trader Inc. Plaintiff can satisfy this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.