(PC)Kauth

(PC)Kauth v. Tulare County Sheriff Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20241:23-cv-01733California4,448 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH VINCENT KAUTH, No. 1:23-cv-01733 GSA (PC) Plaintiff, DISCOVERY AND

SCHEDULING ORDER

v. Discovery Served By: February 7, 2025 TULARE COUNTY SHERIFF Discovery Ends: April 7, 2025 DEPARTMENT, et al., Motions to Compel Due: April 7, 2025 15 Pretrial Motions Due: June 30, 2025 Defendants.

17 Defendant Kenneth Jones, II has answered the complaint. ECF No. 19. Pursuant to 18 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 1, 16, and 26-36, discovery shall proceed in accordance with 19 paragraphs 1-6 of this order. In addition, the court will set a schedule for this litigation. 20 Should this matter proceed to trial the court will, by subsequent order, require the parties 21 to file pretrial statements. In addition to the matters required to be addressed in the pretrial 22 statement in accordance with Local Rule 281, plaintiff will be required to make a particularized 23 showing in the pretrial statement in order to obtain the attendance of witnesses at trial. Plaintiff is 24 advised that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.