Tostonie
(PC) Dorton v. Tostonie
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20241:23-cv-01784California2,790 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRED DORTON, No. 1:23-cv-01784 GSA (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S
v. REQUEST FOR NINETY-DAY EXTENSION
OF TIME TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT
STEVE TOSTONIE, et al., (ECF No. 26) Defendants.
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
REQUEST FOR COPY OF HIS FILED
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
17 (ECF No. 26 at 2-3)
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO
INFORM COURT VIA NOTICE WHY HE
HAS NO ACCESS TO LAW LIBRARY
20 (See ECF No. 26 at 1)
PLAINTIFF’S FILING REGARDING HIS
LACK OF ACCESS TO LAW LIBRARY DUE
IN FOURTEEN DAYS
PLAINTIFF’S THIRD AMENDED
COMPLAINT DUE IN FORTY-FIVE DAYS 25 Plaintiff has filed a motion for a ninety-day extension of time to file a third amended complaint. ECF No. 26. This is Plaintiff’s third request for an extension of time to amend. See…