Tostonie

(PC) Dorton v. Tostonie

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20241:23-cv-01784California2,790 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRED DORTON, No. 1:23-cv-01784 GSA (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

v. REQUEST FOR NINETY-DAY EXTENSION

OF TIME TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT

STEVE TOSTONIE, et al., (ECF No. 26) Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

REQUEST FOR COPY OF HIS FILED

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

17 (ECF No. 26 at 2-3)

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

INFORM COURT VIA NOTICE WHY HE

HAS NO ACCESS TO LAW LIBRARY

20 (See ECF No. 26 at 1)

PLAINTIFF’S FILING REGARDING HIS

LACK OF ACCESS TO LAW LIBRARY DUE

IN FOURTEEN DAYS

PLAINTIFF’S THIRD AMENDED

COMPLAINT DUE IN FORTY-FIVE DAYS 25 Plaintiff has filed a motion for a ninety-day extension of time to file a third amended complaint. ECF No. 26. This is Plaintiff’s third request for an extension of time to amend. See…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.