Schutza
Schutza v. R&H Mission Gorge, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SCOTT SCHUTZA, Case No. 24-cv-0922-BAS-MMP
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
v. MOTION TO DISMISS
PLAINTIFF’S STATE-LAW CLAIM
R&H MISSION GORGE, INC.;
HORNDOGS LLC; and DOES 1–10, (ECF No. 5) Defendants.
The plaintiff has filed claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and the California Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”) against the defendants for failure to provide compliant accessible parking at their businesses. (ECF No. 1 (“Compl.”).) The defendants seek to dismiss Plaintiff’s state-law Unruh claim on the grounds the Court should decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction. (ECF No. 5.) Plaintiff opposes. (ECF No. 7 (“Resp.”).) Defendants reply. (ECF No. 8.) The Court finds the motion suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); CivLR 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons set forth below,…