Jackson Jr. v. Breckenridge Property Fund 2016 LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES R. JACKSON, JR. and Case No.: 3:24-cv-960-CAB-SBC
SUZETTE JACKSON,
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
Appellants, WITH PREJUDICE v.
BRECKENRIDGE PROPERTY FUND [ECF No. 1] 2016, 17 Appellee.
20 This case comes back to the district court after an unsuccessful appeal to the Ninth 21 Circuit. The Circuit dismissed Appellants’ case for lack of jurisdiction. [ECF No. 25.] 22 Although they do so after the passing of their judicially extended deadline, Appellants have 23 now filed an opening brief. [ECF No. 26.] The Court has demanded—multiple times— 24 that Appellants serve their brief on the Appellee. [ECF Nos. 5, 21]; see Fed. R. Bankr. P. 25 8011. Appellants have yet to provide any proof that Appellee has been served with notice 26 of this bankruptcy appeal. 27 28 But another defect plagues this case, and to explain it, the Court briefly sketches the history of the proceeding before the bankruptcy judge. Based on the record before the Court, the key property…