Alonzo
Alonzo v. Dexcom Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 CHARLENE ALONZO, individually and Case No.: 24-cv-1485-RSH-VET on behalf of all others similarly situated, 24-cv-1804-RSH-VET 9 24-cv-1809-RSH-VET Plaintiff, 10 v. ORDER ON MOTIONS TO APPOINT
LEAD COUNSEL AND LEAD
DEXCOM INC., et al., PLAINTIFF AND FOR Defendants.
CONSOLIDATION OF ACTIONS
[ECF Nos. 8, 9, 10, 11]
OAKLAND COUNTY EMPLOYEES’
RETIREMENT SYSTEMS, et al., individually and on behalf of all others 17 similarly situated, 18 Plaintiffs, 19 v. 20 DEXCOM INC., et al., Defendants. 22 MATTHEW CARNES, individually and 23 on behalf of all others similarly situated, 24 Plaintiff, 25 v. 26 DEXCOM INC., et al., 27 Defendants. 28 Before the Court are four motions to consolidate, appoint lead counsel, and appoint lead plaintiff filed by movants K. George Thampy (“Thampy”), the Oakland County Voluntary Employees’ Beneficiary Association and …