Martinez

Martinez v. Ford Motor Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 13, 20243:24-cv-01763California1,034 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 24CV1763-AGS (BLM) TOBY MARTINEZ,

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION

FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH

v. MODIFICATIONS

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a corporation; [ECF NO. 10] DOES 1 through 10;, 15 Defendant.

17 On December 6, 2024, the parties filed a “Joint Motion for Stipulated Protective Order.” Mot., ECF No. 10. The parties agree on all terms of the Protective Order with the exception of paragraph 8 which governs disclosure of the confidential information to independent experts. Id. at 6. LEGAL STANDARD Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 permits courts to enter orders to protect the disclosure of material produced in discovery. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)(1). Rule 26(c) specifies that a party must show good cause for issuance of a protective order. Id. District courts maintain “broad latitude to grant protective orders to prevent disclosure of materials for many types of 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.