Marin

Marin v. Rajaram

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 10, 20243:24-cv-01651California4,230 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MEL MARIN, Case No.: 24cv1651-JAH-BJC

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. 1. GRANTING MOTION TO GEETHA RAJARAM, et al.,

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS,

Defendants. (ECF No. 2);

15 2. DISMISSING COMPLAINT IN PART WITHOUT PREJUDICE

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §

17 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), (ECF No. 1). 18 INTRODUCTION On September 13, 2024, Mel Marin (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed the instant Complaint (“Compl.”) against Geetha Rajaram, Dean Orr, Myke McMullen, Uduak Joentuk, Vivan Malauulu, Sunny Zia, Herlinda Chico, Virginia Baxter, and The Long Beach City College (“LBCC”) (collectively, “Defendants”) alleging violations of his rights under the Rehabilitation Act (“RA”), the Americans With Disabilities Act (“ADA”), the First Amendment, and the Fourteenth Amendment. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff also filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). ECF No. 2. After…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.