(PC) Salazar v. Fresno County Sheriff's Office

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20241:24-cv-00167California1,559 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AUGUSTIN SALAZAR, Case No. 1:24-cv-00167-KES-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS CASE

v. FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM AND

DISMISSING CASE FOR FAILURE TO

FRESNO COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, PROSECUTE Defendant. (Doc. 14) 16 Plaintiff Augustin Salazar is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this prisoner civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Docs. 7, 12.) The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 20, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge screened the complaint, found it failed to state a cognizable claim for relief, and granted plaintiff until April 22, 2024, to either: (1) file an amended complaint, (2) stand on his original complaint subject to the recommendation of dismissal, or (3) voluntarily dismiss this action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.