Torres

(PC) Holland v. Torres

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 13, 20241:24-cv-00557California2,810 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THADIUS J. HOLLAND, Case No. 1:24-cv-00557-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO

v. ACTION

TORRES, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN

Defendants. CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

(ECF No. 15) FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 18 Plaintiff Thadius J. Holland (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 19 pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court screened Plaintiff’s 20 complaint, and Plaintiff was granted leave to amend. Plaintiff’s first amended complaint is before 21 the Court for screening. (ECF No. 15.)

I. Screening Requirement and Standard

23 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a 24 governmental entity and/or against an officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. 25 § 1915A(a).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.