Doerer

(PC) Higgins-Vogt v. Doerer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 13, 20241:24-cv-01188California656 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MATTHEW HIGGINS-VOGT, No. 1:24-cv-01188 GSA (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW

CAUSE WHY THIS MATTER SHOULD NOT

v. BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO OBEY

COURT ORDER

J. DOERER, (See ECF No. 2) Defendant.

PLAINTIFF’S SHOWING OF CAUSE, OR IN

THE ALTERNATIVE, HIS RESPONSE TO

COURT ORDER DUE IN THIRTY DAYS

18 Plaintiff, a federal inmate proceeding pro se, appears to have filed this civil rights action 19 to seek relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 20 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff will be ordered to show cause why this matter 22 should not be dismissed for failure to obey a court order. In the alternative, Plaintiff may file a 23 signed complaint with the above-referenced case number on it along with a complete application 24 to proceed in forma pauperis. See ECF No. 2. Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.