Lambert
Business Architecture Guild v. Lambert
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 BUSINESS ARCHITECTURE GUILD, Case No. 23-cv-00944-BLF
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING RENEWED
v. MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS
COUNSEL
DANIEL LAMBERT, et al., [Re: ECF 55] Defendants.
12 Before the Court is a Renewed Motion to Withdraw as Counsel filed by Defendants’ counsel, Eric Menhart (“Counsel Menhart”). ECF 55. This time, Counsel Menhart has cited the correct legal standard and has supplied evidentiary support for the motion. See id. As such, the Renewed Motion to Withdraw as Counsel complies with local rules. See Optrics Inc. v. Barracuda Networks Inc., No. 17–cv–04977–RS, 2020 WL 1815690, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2020) (“In this district, the conduct of counsel, including withdrawal of counsel, is governed by the standards of professional conduct required of members of the State Bar of California.”); Civil Local Rules 7-5; 11–4(a)(1); 11–5(a). The Renewed Motion to Withdraw as Counsel is GRANTED. 21 …