Lambert

Business Architecture Guild v. Lambert

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 13, 20245:23-cv-00944California666 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 BUSINESS ARCHITECTURE GUILD, Case No. 23-cv-00944-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING RENEWED

v. MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS

COUNSEL

DANIEL LAMBERT, et al., [Re: ECF 55] Defendants.

12 Before the Court is a Renewed Motion to Withdraw as Counsel filed by Defendants’ counsel, Eric Menhart (“Counsel Menhart”). ECF 55. This time, Counsel Menhart has cited the correct legal standard and has supplied evidentiary support for the motion. See id. As such, the Renewed Motion to Withdraw as Counsel complies with local rules. See Optrics Inc. v. Barracuda Networks Inc., No. 17–cv–04977–RS, 2020 WL 1815690, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2020) (“In this district, the conduct of counsel, including withdrawal of counsel, is governed by the standards of professional conduct required of members of the State Bar of California.”); Civil Local Rules 7-5; 11–4(a)(1); 11–5(a). The Renewed Motion to Withdraw as Counsel is GRANTED. 21 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.