Rodriguez
Rodriguez v. Macy's, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 MANUEL RODRIGUEZ, Case No. 24-cv-08798-NC 11 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE v. REMANDED TO STATE COURT MACY'S, INC., et al., Re: ECF 1 Defendants. 15 16 This Court orders Defendant Macy’s Retail Holdings, LLC (erroneously and additionally sued and served as Macy’s Inc. and Macy’s West Stores, Inc.; hereinafter “Macy’s”) to show cause why this case should not be remanded back to state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and lack of full consent of co-defendants. I. Federal Question Jurisdiction Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 377 (1994). District courts have subject matter jurisdiction through federal question or diversity jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1332. Diversity jurisdiction requires complete…