Smith v. University Inn Hotel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CANDACE SMITH, Case No. 1:24-cv-01316-EPG Plaintiff, ORDER TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE

v. AND

UNIVERSITY INN HOTEL, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE

Defendants. DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND

WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND, FOR

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH RULE 8 OF

THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL

PROCEDURE AND FOR LACK OF SUBJECT-

MATTER JURISDICTION

18 (ECF No. 1)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

THIRTY (30) DAYS 21 22 Plaintiff Candace Smith (“Plaintiff”) proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 23 rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint, filed on October 28, 2024, 24 alleges various claims against University Inn Hotel, Ramada Inn Hotel, Picadilly Inn Hotel, 25 Starbucks, Extended Stay Hotel, and Planet Fitness. 26 Plaintiff’s complaint is now before the Court…