(HC)Tobar

(HC)Tobar v. Current or Acting Field Office Director, San Francisco Field Office, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 11, 20241:24-cv-01513California490 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 WALTER APARICIO TOBAR, Case No. 24-cv-08550-SK (PR)

A#205411487,

8 Petitioner, ORDER OF TRANSFER 9 v. (ECF Nos. 2 & 3)

CURRENT OR ACTING FIELD OFFICE

DIRECTOR, et al.,

Respondent.

I. Petitioner Walter Aparicio Tobar, a citizen of Guatemala, filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 challenging his prolonged detention by the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) at the Golden State Annex detention center in McFarland, California. II. The federal habeas statute expressly limits the power of district courts to grant habeas writs to “within their respective jurisdictions.” 28 U.S.C. § 2241(a). “The plain language of the habeas statute thus confirms the general rule that for core habeas petitions challenging present physical confinement, jurisdiction lies in only one district: the district of confinement.” Rumsfeld v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.