(PS) Peacemaker v. Mitchell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHIRLY A. PEACEMAKER, Case No. 2:21-cv-1715-DC-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS MONICA MITCHELL, et al., Defendants. 16 I previously granted plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and screened her original complaint. ECF No. 5. I notified plaintiff that the complaint failed to establish a basis for the court’s jurisdiction and granted her thirty days to file an amended complaint. Id. Plaintiff subsequently filed an amended complaint and paid the filing fee. ECF No. 6. On November 7, 2024, I ordered plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed sua sponte for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. ECF No. 22; see Arbaugh v. Y&H Corp., 546 U.S. 500, 514 (2006) (holding that courts “have an independent obligation to determine whether subject-matter jurisdiction exists, even in the absence of a challenge from any party”); Cal. Diversified Promotions, Inc. v. Musick, 505…