Chan

(PS) Meyer v. Chan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 13, 20242:23-cv-00718California874 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LIAM MEYER TRUST, LIAM MEYER, Case No. 2:23-cv-0718-DC-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SIMON CHAN, et al., Defendants. 16 On October 2, 2024, I screened plaintiff’s complaint, notified him that it did not state a claim, and granted him thirty days to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 3. Plaintiff failed to timely file an amended complaint or otherwise to respond to the court order. Therefore, on November 19, 2024, I ordered plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed. ECF No. 5. I notified plaintiff that if he wished to continue with this lawsuit, he must file an amended complaint. I also warned plaintiff that failure to comply with the November 19, 2024 order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id. Plaintiff has not responded to the order to show cause, and the time to do so has passed. The court has the inherent power to control its docket and may, in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.