(PS) Green v. The John Stewart Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
VIRGINIA SUE GREEN, No. 2:24-cv-0378 DJC SCR PS
Plaintiff,
v. ORDER
THE JOHN STEWART COMPANY, et al., 15 Defendants.
17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action, which was accordingly referred to the undersigned by operation of Local Rule 302(c)(21). Plaintiff filed a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). ECF No. 2. However, the application is largely incomplete and does not provide the information necessary for the Court to make a determination. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Specifically, Plaintiff does not include income information. The Court will grant plaintiff 30 days to submit a complete IFP application. The Court will refrain from completing the mandatory screening required of IFP complaints under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) unless or until Plaintiff files a complete IFP application. However, in provisionally screening the Complaint, the Court notes that Plaintiff fails to state 28 …