Experian

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ARTICE JACKSON, No. 2:24-cv-1122-TLN-SCR Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS W. GREGORY KLEIN, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff Artice Jackson is proceeding pro se in this action, which was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On April 15, 2024, Plaintiff filed a complaint and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). ECF Nos. 1 and 2. On September 17, 2024, this Court screened the complaint per the screening process required by the IFP statute and concluded the complaint failed to allege facts establishing federal jurisdiction and failed to state a claim. ECF No. 4. The Court’s order allowed Plaintiff 30 days to file an amended complaint that cured the deficiencies and stated the amended complaint “must include a sufficient jurisdictional statement and comply with Rule 8.” ECF No. 4 at 5. The Order warned that noncompliance may result in a…