Thomas

Thomas v. Costco Wholesale Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20242:24-cv-00986California3,821 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LASHAWN THOMAS AND DOMONAE No. 2:24-cv-00986-TLN-SCR

SCARBROUGH,

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER

14 v.

COSTCO WHOLESALE

CORPORATION, et al., Defendants,

18 This matter is before the Court on Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation’s (“Costco”) Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 3.) Plaintiffs Lashawn Thomas and Domonae Scarbrough (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) oppose. (ECF No. 10.) Costco filed a reply. (ECF No. 11.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Costco’s motion to dismiss. /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiffs are two African-American women. (ECF No. 1 at 24.) On August 10, 2023, Plaintiffs went shopping at Costco and decided to use the self-checkout lane. (Id. at 26.) Plaintiffs entered the self-checkout area, and Thomas handed Scarbrough the Costco card to begin the transaction. (Id.) Scarbrough scanned the card and then began scanning the items…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.