Salmonson

(PC) Cano v. Salmonson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 13, 20242:24-cv-01568California432 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BENJAMIN CANO, Case No. 2:24-cv-1568-DAD-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE S. SALMONSON, et al., Defendants. 16 On September 16, 2024, I screened plaintiff’s complaint and notified him that it did not state a claim. ECF No. 9. I ordered him to file, within thirty days, either an amended complaint or a notice stating his intent to stand by his current complaint. Id. On October 17, 2024, I granted plaintiff’s request for an additional thirty days to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 11. To date, plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. The court has the inherent power to control its docket and may, in the exercise of that power, impose sanctions where appropriate, including dismissal. Bautista v. Los Angeles Cnty., 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 2000); see Local Rule 110 (“Failure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.