Bonta

(PS) Weinapple v. Bonta

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20242:24-cv-01769California3,034 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL PAUL WEINAPPLE, Case No. 2:24-cv-1769-DAD-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ROB BONTA, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, brings this case against Attorney General of California Rob Bonta and Scott Johnston and M. Bischel, both special agents for the Attorney General’s Office. ECF No. 1 at 3. He alleges that defendants violated his civil rights by placing him on a list prohibiting possession of firearms, confiscating his firearms, and causing him to lose his job selling firearms at an outdoor supply store. ECF No. 1 at 4-5. Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss, seeking dismissal of all claims against them. ECF No. 9. After review of the pleadings, I recommend that the motion be granted. I. Legal Standards A complaint may be dismissed under that rule for “failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). To survive a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.