Eason
(PC) Phillips v. Eason
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NICHOLAS PHILLIPS, No. 2:24-cv-2295 CSK P Plaintiff, AMENDED SCREENING ORDER AND
ORDER TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING
v. AFTER STAY OF THIS ACTION IS LIFTED OFFICER B. EASON, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff appears pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 13, 2024, this action was stayed pending referral of this case to the Post-Screening ADR Project. (ECF No. 15.) On December 6, 2024, defendant B. Eason filed an answer and noted that plaintiff also included a supplemental state law claim, which was not addressed in the initial screening order. (ECF No. 16 at 1.) Plaintiff appended to his federal civil rights complaint a separate California form complaint directed to the San Joaquin County Superior Court. (ECF No. 1 at 5-9.) In this separate complaint, plaintiff alleges a motor vehicle personal injury cause of action against defendant Officer B. Eason, but…