(PS) Biggins v. Winn Companies LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 11, 20242:24-cv-02736California452 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARNAE BIGGINS, No. 2:24-cv-2736 TLN AC PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS WINN COMPANIES, LLC, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to the undersigned for pretrial matters by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21). On October 18, 2024, the court granted plaintiff’s in forma pauperis (“IFP”) application but rejected the complaint, granting plaintiff 30 days to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 3. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to file an amended complaint could lead to a recommendation that the action be dismissed. Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint within the time limit. On November 20, 2024, the court issued an order to show cause within 14 days why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. ECF No. 4. Plaintiff has not responded to the court’s orders, nor taken any action to prosecute this case. In…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.