Martinez

(PC) Stevens v. Martinez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 17, 20241:21-cv-01144California1,616 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LYRALISA LAVENA STEVENS, Case No. 1:21-cv-01144-JLT-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT

PETERSON’S MOTION TO COMPEL

v. C. MARTINEZ, (Doc. 38) Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Lyralisa Lavena Stevens is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against Defendants Martinez and Peterson for violations of Plaintiff’s constitutional rights. I. INTRODUCTION On September 3, 2024, Defendant Peterson filed a motion to compel a response from Plaintiff to request number 4 of Peterson’s request for production of documents. (Doc. 38.) When more than 21 days passed, on October 2, 2024, the Court issued its “Order to Show Cause (OSC) Why Sanctions Should Not Be Imposed for Plaintiff’s Failure to File an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition.” (Doc. 40.) Plaintiff was directed to show cause in writing, within 14 days, why sanctions should not be imposed.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.