In re A.J. CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 17, 2024C099657California4,901 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mesiwala, J.

Filed 12/17/24 In re A.J. CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(San Joaquin) ----

In re A.J., a Person Coming Under C099657 the Juvenile Court Law.

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY (Super. Ct. No. HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY, STKJDDP20200000248)

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

J.J. et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

J.J. (father) and J.R. (mother) (collectively, parents) appeal from juvenile court orders under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 terminating their parental rights to their daughter, A.J. (daughter). Mother contends the court prejudicially erred by applying an improper factor in finding the beneficial parental relationship…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.