City of Westminster v. Webb CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 17, 2024G063189California2,700 words

Opinion

Opinion

FACTS

I.

THE APPOINTMENT ORDER

At all times relevant to this appeal, Dianna owned a residential real property in the City of Westminster, where she lived with her adult son, Jason Webb.1 In July 2020, the city issued a notice to abate conditions of the property, listing fire hazards, inadequate sanitation, unsanitary stagnant water, and building code violations. In September 2022, the city filed a petition asserting the property constituted an ongoing public nuisance. The petition asked the trial court to appoint a receiver under Health and Safety Code section 17980 et seq. to abate the nuisance. In December 2022, after two prior hearings where she appeared on her own behalf, Dianna filed a responsive pleading through her first attorney. One week later, the court granted Dianna’s motion to continue the

1 Because they share a surname, we will refer to Dianna and

Jason by their first names. We do not distinguish between Dianna and any related trust with respect to ownership of the property.

2 proceedings, based on her representation that the alleged violations would be resolved. The following month, in January 2023 (all dates without mention of the year will refer to 2023),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.