(PC)Sandoval

(PC)Sandoval v. Lopez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 17, 20241:23-cv-00248California5,665 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JULIO SANDOVAL, Case No.: 1:23-cv-00248-JLT-SKO (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

GRANT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

v. DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

M. LOPEZ, et al., (Doc. 24)

Defendants. 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

Plaintiff Julio Sandoval is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s s Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claims and failure to protect/threat to safety claims against Defendants Andrade, Cerillo, Felix, Lopez, Miguel, Perez, and William. I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On May 29, 2024, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s first amended complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 24.) On June 12, 2024, Plaintiff filed a document titled “Request for extension of time to submit Opposition to Defendants Answer to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.