Lipscomb

Lipscomb v. Edwards Air Force Base, Department of the Air Force

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 17, 20241:24-cv-01308California1,096 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRENTON LIPSCOMB, Case No.: 1:24-cv-01308-JLT-CDB

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

v. (Docs. 2, 6) EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE, et al., Defendants.

16 Background Plaintiff Brenton Lipscomb (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, initiated four actions with the filing of four separate complaints and associated applications to proceed in forma pauperis on October 25, 2024. (Docs. 1, 2). See Case Numbers: 1:24-cv-01305-JLT-CDB (“Action 1305”), 1:24-cv-01306-CDB (“Action 1306”), 1:24-cv-01307-CDB (“Action 1307”), and 1:24- cv-01308-JLT-CDB (“Action 1308”) (collectively, “Actions 1305-1308”). Plaintiff’s complaints in these actions allege substantially similar facts and nearly identical causes of action against related defendants. (See Doc. 1). On November 26, 2024, the undersigned entered Findings and Recommendations that are now pending with the assigned district judge to dismiss Action 1305, Action 1306, and Action 1307…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.