Epperson

Epperson v. Codification Order 497

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 17, 20241:24-cv-01355California2,254 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. Background

20 Plaintiff initiated this action on November 6, 2024. (Doc. 1.) On November 8, 2024, the 21 Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), and determined that the 22 complaint failed to comply with the pleading requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8 23 and failed to establish this Court’s subject matter jurisdiction. The Court granted Plaintiff leave 24 to amend within thirty (30) days of service of the Court’s order. (Doc. 4.) Plaintiff was expressly 25 warned that if he failed to file an amended complaint in compliance with the Court’s order, then 26 the Court would recommend dismissal of this action. (Id. at 5.) 27 The deadline for Plaintiff to file an amended complaint has passed and Plaintiff has not 28 complied with the Court’s order. Instead, Plaintiff filed a single-page document on November 18, 2024. (Doc. 5.) This document cannot be construed as an amended complaint because it lacks basic information, including the name of any defendant or any factual allegations. It states only the following: No.24-1355 Mississippi Cross-Judgment 4855. Sllybus Amicus Brief

Chris…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.