(PC) Grayson v. Sacramento County Jail

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 17, 20242:23-cv-02887California3,383 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ZIQUAN S. GRAYSON, No. 2:23-cv-2887 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO COUNTY JAIL, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a county inmate who filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 without a lawyer. He has requested leave to proceed without paying the full filing fee for this action, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Because the first two requests were deficient (ECF Nos. 2, 7), plaintiff was required to file a third request. See ECF Nos. 6, 8. Plaintiff has now submitted a third request with a declaration (ECF Nos. 9-10) showing that he cannot afford to pay the entire filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 9) is granted.1 24 This means that plaintiff is allowed to pay the $350.00 filing fee in monthly installments that 25 are taken from the inmate’s trust account rather than in one lump sum. 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). As part of this order,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.