Steven Anderson v. Idoc Policy Administration Board Members

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 18, 202422-35987California568 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 18 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STEVEN ANDERSON, No. 22-35987

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:22-cv-00259-DCN

v.

MEMORANDUM*

IDOC POLICY ADMINISTRATION

BOARD MEMBERS; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho David C. Nye, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 4, 2024 Portland, Oregon

Before: CALLAHAN, NGUYEN, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff Steven Anderson appeals the district court’s dismissal of his

Amended Complaint, which challenges the constitutionality of one of his parole

conditions under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Amended Complaint requests three forms

of relief: declaratory relief, injunctive relief, and damages. The district court

dismissed Plaintiff’s § 1983 action as barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. 487 (1994), reasoning that a successful…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.