Steven Anderson v. Idoc Policy Administration Board Members
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 18, 202422-35987California568 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 18 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
STEVEN ANDERSON, No. 22-35987
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:22-cv-00259-DCN
v.
MEMORANDUM*
IDOC POLICY ADMINISTRATION
BOARD MEMBERS; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho David C. Nye, Chief District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted December 4, 2024 Portland, Oregon
Before: CALLAHAN, NGUYEN, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.
Plaintiff Steven Anderson appeals the district court’s dismissal of his
Amended Complaint, which challenges the constitutionality of one of his parole
conditions under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Amended Complaint requests three forms
of relief: declaratory relief, injunctive relief, and damages. The district court
dismissed Plaintiff’s § 1983 action as barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477,
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. 487 (1994), reasoning that a successful…