Minero Chicas v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 18, 202423-3786California853 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 18 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WILLIAM RONALDO MINERO No. 23-3786 CHICAS; ALISSON VERALY ORANTES Agency Nos. MINERO; A.E.M.O, a minor, A220-586-378

A220-586-379

Petitioners,

A220-586-380

v.

MEMORANDUM

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 3, 2024 Pasadena, California

Before: SANCHEZ and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges, and ZIPPS, Chief District Judge.***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Jennifer G. Zipps, Chief United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. Petitioner William Ronaldo Minero Chicas, a native and citizen of El

Salvador, seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.