People v. Reed CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 18, 2024F088039California1,185 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 12/18/24 P. v. Reed CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE,

F088039

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. VCF398368) v.

JIMMY LEE REED, OPINION Defendant and Appellant.

THE COURT*

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County. Nathan G. Leedy, Judge. Rex Adam Williams, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Office of the Attorney General, Sacramento, California, for Plaintiff and Respondent. -ooOoo-

* Before Levy, Acting P. J., Poochigian, J. and Franson, J. Appellant Jimmy Lee Reed is represented in this appeal by appointed counsel Rex Adam Williams. Pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende), Williams filed a brief that raised no arguable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.