In re A.R. CA3

DISCUSSION

I Parental Relationship Exception Father contends the juvenile court prejudicially erred in finding the parental relationship exception to adoption inapplicable to father and son. We disagree. “ ‘ “Once reunification services are ordered terminated, the focus shifts to the needs of the child for permanency and stability.’ ” [Citation.] “A section 366.26 hearing … is a hearing specifically designed to select and implement a permanent plan for the child.” [Citation.]’ ” (In re Andrew M. (2024) 102 Cal.App.5th 803, 814.) The possible permanent plans are listed in order of preference in section 366.26, and adoption has the highest priority. (§ 366.26, subd. (b)(1).)

services and set a hearing for the selection and implementation of a permanent plan (a section 366.26 hearing). (In re J.E., at pp. 563-564.)

3 If the court determines that the child is adoptable, it must “terminate parental rights and order the child placed for adoption” unless an exception applies. (§ 366.26, subd. (c)(1).) One such exception is the parental relationship exception. (§ 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i).) To establish that exception, the parent must show three elements: “(1) the parent maintained…