Salvador Duenas v. Los Angeles Police Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 18, 20242:23-cv-06108California443 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 SALVADOR DUENAS, Case No. 2:23-06108 FMO (ADS)

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER ACCEPTING UNITED STATES

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND

LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPT., et al., RECOMMENDATION

Defendants.

16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United State Magistrate Judge, (Dkt. No. 23). No objections were filed, and the time to do so has passed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. Although Plaintiff did not object to the Report, he filed a Motion to Stay Proceedings. (Dkt. No. 26.) Plaintiff alleges that he has “recently been convicted in a related state criminal proceeding and sentenced to eight (8) years of incarceration” and 24 that he seeks a six-month stay of this case while he pursues a criminal appeal, “which may directly affect the issues raised in this case.” Id. at 2. Plaintiff’s motion for a stay is denied. To…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.