Fernandez

Fernandez v. Duarte

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 18, 20243:22-cv-00446California914 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRANK J. FERNANDEZ, Case No.: 3:22-cv-00446-BAS-VET

Plaintiff,

REPORT & RECOMMENDATION

v. ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

SUPPRESS DEPOSITION

E. DUARTE,

Defendant. 15 16 This Report and Recommendation is submitted to United States District Judge Cynthia Bashant pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Civil Local Rule 72.1.c. I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Suppress Deposition of Plaintiff (“Motion to Suppress”). Doc. No. 72. Therein, Plaintiff requests that the Court “suppress and void” his May 3, 2024 deposition, which the Court interprets as a request to suppress Plaintiff’s deposition testimony. The sole basis for the Motion to Suppress is Defendant’s failure to obtain leave of court to depose Plaintiff pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(a)(2)(B).1 Id. at 1. Having considered the Motion to Suppress, and the record before it, 26 27 Unless otherwise indicated, all references to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.