Raymond Juarez v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 18, 20242:24-cv-00700California248 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL

Case No. 2:24-cv-00700-SPG-E Date December 18, 2024 Title JUAREZ et al. v. T-MOBILE, USA INC. et al.

a Present: The Honorable SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

P. Gomez Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present Not Present

Proceeding: (INCHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD

NOT BE DISMISSED

The Court is in receipt of the status reports filed by Plaintiffs Raymond Juarez, Anthony Foster, Roxy Lopez, Sherri Sherwood, and Rachel Galarsa (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), (ECF No. 30), and Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc., (ECF No. 31), which indicate that no efforts have been made to arbitrate this case. See (ECF Nos. 30, 31). The Court enjoys the inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion. See, e.g., Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629 (1962) (“The authority of a federal trial court to dismiss a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.