Vang

(PC) Bellows v. Vang

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 18, 20241:22-cv-00300California591 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PATRICIA BELLOWS, Case No.: 1:22-cv-00300-KES-CDB Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO OBEY COURT

ORDER

K. VANG, et al., 14-DAY DEADLINE Defendants.

Plaintiff Patricia Bellows is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The action proceeds on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment failure to protect claims against Defendants Villaboas and Voguel, and Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claim against Defendant McClain. I. INTRODUCTION On October 30, 2024, the Court issued its Order Referring Case to Post-Screening ADR and Staying Case for 120 Days. (Doc. 28.) In relevant part, the parties were directed to “file the attached notice, indicating their agreement to proceed to an early settlement conference or their belief that settlement is not achievable at this time”…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.