Hilton Mincy v. California Department of Correctons and Rehabilitation-Division of Adult Parole Operations

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 17, 20242:24-cv-06853California286 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTE S – GENERAL

Case No. 2:24-CV-06853-AB (SK) Date: December 17, 2024 Title Mincy v. CDCR-Div. of Adult Parole Operations et al.

Present: The Honorable: Steve Kim, United States Magistrate Judge

Connie Chung n/a

Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorneys Present for Defendant(s):

None present None present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL

FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a named defendant within 90 days after the complaint is filed. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Plaintiff filed his complaint on August 12, 2024, and the Court issued a summons on August 20, 2024. (ECF 1, 5). Pursuant to the Initial Case Management Order, a copy of which is attached here, the deadline for plaintiff to serve the complaint and summons on the defendants named in this action passed on November 10, 2024. (ECF 4). Plaintiff has yet to file any proof of service of his complaint against any…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.