Morris

Morris v. Wells Fargo & Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 18, 20244:23-cv-03277California5,485 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ANTHONY MORRIS, Case No. 23-cv-03277-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 62 Defendants.

12 Before the Court is Wells Fargo & Company and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s first amended class action complaint, Dkt. No. 62. The Court finds the matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and deems it submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). The Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART the motion. I. BACKGROUND On May 23, 2023, Anthony Morris (“Plaintiff”) filed this putative class action against Wells Fargo & Company (“WF & Co.”), Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“the Bank”), and Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc., in San Francisco Superior Court. Dkt. No. 1. On June 30, 2023, the defendants removed the case to federal court. Id. Plaintiff’s lawsuit arises from “[Wells Fargo’s] failure to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.