United States v. Nathan Wilson

Good Law
123 F.4th 1021
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 19, 202423-50016California7,123 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-50016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 2:20-cr-00516-

FMO-

v.

NATHAN WILSON;

OPINION

CHRISTOPHER BEASLEY,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Fernando M. Olguin, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted May 6, 2024 Pasadena, California

Filed December 19, 2024

Before: Danielle J. Forrest and Patrick J. Bumatay, Circuit Judges, and James Donato, * District Judge.

Opinion by Judge Forrest; Concurrence by Judge Bumatay; Concurrence by Judge Donato

* The Honorable James Donato, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation. SUMMARY **

Criminal Law

In a case in which the government alleges that Nathan Wilson and Christoher Beasley (Defendants) set fire to a police car during a protest following the killing of George Floyd, the panel reversed the district court’s selective- prosecution discovery order, reversed the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice an indictment charging Defendants with arson, and remanded…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.