Teradata Corporation v. Sap Se

Good Law
124 F.4th 555
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 19, 202423-16065California8,777 words

Opinion

Opinion

MILLER, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TERADATA CORPORATION; No. 23-16065

TERADATA US, INC.; TERADATA

OPERATIONS, INC., D.C. No. 3:18-cv- 03670-WHO Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. OPINION

SAP SE; SAP AMERICA, INC.; SAP

LABS, LLC,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California William Horsley Orrick, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 12, 2024 San Francisco, California

Filed December 19, 2024

Before: Eric D. Miller, Bridget S. Bade, and Lawrence VanDyke, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Miller SUMMARY *

Antitrust / Trade Secrets

The panel reversed the district court’s summary judgment in favor of SAP SE in Teradata Corporation’s action alleging that SAP illegally conditioned sales of its business-management software on sales of its back-end database engine in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, and misappropriated Teradata’s trade secrets in violation of the California Uniform Trade Secrets Act. The panel reversed the district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.