Teradata Corporation v. Sap Se
124 F.4th 555
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 19, 202423-16065California8,777 words
Opinion
Opinion
MILLER, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TERADATA CORPORATION; No. 23-16065
TERADATA US, INC.; TERADATA
OPERATIONS, INC., D.C. No. 3:18-cv- 03670-WHO Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v. OPINION
SAP SE; SAP AMERICA, INC.; SAP
LABS, LLC,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California William Horsley Orrick, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted February 12, 2024 San Francisco, California
Filed December 19, 2024
Before: Eric D. Miller, Bridget S. Bade, and Lawrence VanDyke, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Miller SUMMARY *
Antitrust / Trade Secrets
The panel reversed the district court’s summary judgment in favor of SAP SE in Teradata Corporation’s action alleging that SAP illegally conditioned sales of its business-management software on sales of its back-end database engine in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, and misappropriated Teradata’s trade secrets in violation of the California Uniform Trade Secrets Act. The panel reversed the district…