Urbano
Urbano v. Timberlake
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 19 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JUSTIN TIMBERLAKE, No. 24-652 D.C. No. 2:22-cv-04512-FLA-E Defendant - Appellant,
v. MEMORANDUM*
JOHN URBANO,
Plaintiff - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 19, 2024** San Francisco, California
Before: BEA, OWENS, and KOH, Circuit Judges.
Defendant Justin Timberlake (“Timberlake”) challenges the district court’s
denial of his motion (“Motion”) under California’s anti-SLAPP statute codified in
California Civil Procedure Code section 425.16 (“anti-SLAPP”). As the parties are
familiar with the facts, we do not recount them here. We affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).…