Singh
Singh v. Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 19, 202423-3321California946 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 19 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KULDIP SINGH, No. 23-3321 Agency No. Petitioner, A205-939-899 v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted November 22, 2024** San Jose, California
Before: BERZON and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges, and KENNELLY, District Judge.***
Kuldip Singh, a native and citizen of India, seeks review of the Board of
Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming the immigration judge’s (“IJ”)
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation. denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against