Singh

Singh v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 19, 202423-3321California946 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 19 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KULDIP SINGH, No. 23-3321 Agency No. Petitioner, A205-939-899 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 22, 2024** San Jose, California

Before: BERZON and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges, and KENNELLY, District Judge.***

Kuldip Singh, a native and citizen of India, seeks review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming the immigration judge’s (“IJ”)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation. denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against

Torture…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.