Peterson

Peterson v. Best

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 19, 202424-354California685 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 19 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RANDOLPH V. PETERSON, No. 24-354 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:22-cv-00219-TOR v.

MEMORANDUM*

RYAN BEST, an individual doing business as Best Law PLLC; BEST LAW OFFICE, PLLC, a Washington professional limited liability company,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Thomas O. Rice, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 3, 2024 Seattle, Washington

Before: BOGGS, McKEOWN, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.**

Randolph Peterson appeals the district court’s summary judgment for Ryan

Best and Best Law Office, PLLC in a diversity action alleging legal malpractice

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Danny J. Boggs, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation. under Washington law. We have jurisdiction under 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.